IMO you should identify that KFF stands for Kaiser Family Foundation, an organization with a stellar reputation for high quality non-partisan health and health care research and data analysis. Dr. Gounder's role with them gives me great confidence in her remarks.
Keep in mind that the powers that be are using debt as a control mechanism. Policies that encourage high levels of personal debt (e.g., for education, housing, or medical care) produce a populace that is extraordinarily risk-averse. A person with a large mortgage and student loans is far less likely to participate in a strike, protest, or prolonged political movement for fear of missing a payment and losing everything.
What happens to the people that falsely use that voter public data information to claim discrepancies on Thousands if not Tens of thousands. One person contesting Thousands of legitimate votes NOW multiply that times Hundreds, thousands Making those claims to delay or outright suspend those Democratic votes by a handful of republicans? Seems that's been happening for the last several elections with no mention of the possibly MILLIONS of Votes that are Discarded or disregarded as a blind eye is turned into a tool to disfranchise Citizens rights to Vote?
Did anyone from Ch 10 Boston ask the CEO of Breaking Grounds Coffee Shop who makes $607K if she did not make over a half million dollars a year running a non profit if they could have kept the coffee shop open for those poor dissabled folks? I will bet there will be plenty of funding available for her next raise.
By Trump-logic it stands to reason that 2016 and 2024 should be equally suspect - why no mention of this?
In fact, those are the elections that are MORE likely to have had foreign interference: Russia, China, North Korea could not possibly benefit more than to have Mr. Trump in charge.
President Donald Trump claimed the U.S. election system has "shocking vulnerabilities" during a July 16, 2026 address. He stated that national infrastructure falls "catastrophically short" of secure standards. Trump announced the immediate declassification of several intelligence files. However, independent analysts report the files provide no evidence of vote manipulation or altered outcomes.
No, appellate and supreme courts have not overruled the disbarments of Donald Trump’s lawyers. High-level disciplinary decisions—such as the disbarments of Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman—have been consistently upheld or finalized by appellate courts.
1) Rudy Giuliani: The New York Supreme Court Appellate Division disbarred Giuliani in July 2024 for spreading false election claims. His disbarment was subsequently finalized in Washington, D.C., and appeals courts have not overturned these rulings.
2) John Eastman: The California Supreme Court officially disbarred Eastman in April 2026 over his efforts to subvert the 2020 election. This finalized a long appeal process through the State Bar Court and the state supreme court.
3) Jeffrey Clark: The D.C. Court of Appeals and other disciplinary boards have also progressed with disciplinary actions, with Clark's disbarment recommendations moving forward upon appeal.
We use cookies, device fingerprinting and cross-device tracking to personalise content, serve targeted advertising, and analyse how you use our site across your devices. By clicking Accept all you consent to the use of these tracking technologies. Your data may be used to build a profile of your interests and show you personalised ads on other sites.
Privacy policy
Comments (20)
Daily Junction discussion mixed with clearly attributed comments from the original video provider.
Join in — free. Comments on Daily Junction are for members, so real names stay rare and bots stay out.
One field. We email you a 6-digit code — no password needed. Your comment is kept while you do it.
Under 13? You’ll need a parent’s OK first — it takes them one click.
Easter Bunny ✅
Tooth Fairy ✅
Massive Voter Fraud 🤨
In fact, those are the elections that are MORE likely to have had foreign interference: Russia, China, North Korea could not possibly benefit more than to have Mr. Trump in charge.
1) Rudy Giuliani: The New York Supreme Court Appellate Division disbarred Giuliani in July 2024 for spreading false election claims. His disbarment was subsequently finalized in Washington, D.C., and appeals courts have not overturned these rulings.
2) John Eastman: The California Supreme Court officially disbarred Eastman in April 2026 over his efforts to subvert the 2020 election. This finalized a long appeal process through the State Bar Court and the state supreme court.
3) Jeffrey Clark: The D.C. Court of Appeals and other disciplinary boards have also progressed with disciplinary actions, with Clark's disbarment recommendations moving forward upon appeal.