Daily Junction Play
794watching now
Times News 19 Jul 2026 45 here now

Labour Poised For Major North Sea Oil U-Turn As Andy Burnham Takes Office | Conservative MP

“It's a question about whether you want to burn imported oil and gas or want to burn the gas generated in this country that brings us jobs.”

Places like Aberdeen could experience a "jobs emergency" i

For You

Because of what you watch

Comments (24)

Daily Junction discussion mixed with clearly attributed comments from the original video provider.

Join in — free. Comments on Daily Junction are for members, so real names stay rare and bots stay out.

One field. We email you a 6-digit code — no password needed. Your comment is kept while you do it.

Under 13? You’ll need a parent’s OK first — it takes them one click.

@
Idiot! The UK government don’t own oil and gas in the North Sea. Private companies do. So all these people saying it’s good for us are being fooled.
@
but they will prob sell the oil and not use it domestically . now the prices are higher . knock 2p of a liter for us and make and steal loads behind the scenes
@
Well I didn’t see that coming
@
What about net zero and the data centres, is that all forgotten now😂
@
Take it back into public ownership like Norway
@
@Shah-y7h From YouTube ↗ 20 Jul 2026 1
TIME drill and get Billions off pounds in Treasury esp with oil crisis . plus create Thousand of Jobs and Businesses in Scotland
@
I mean they aren't, they're pretending to but keeping the ban on new licences in place.
@
Meanwhile Norway have trillions on their sovereign wealth fund !!
@
Well done open all ports.
@
It's not just jobs, property prices have absolutely crashed over the past ten years!
@
Ed Millibrain must be fumming... 🤣🤣
@
A small point, we don’t burn oil. It’s not used for energy production, it’s turned into products, not only plastics, but e.g. roads as well. Those products can’t be magically produced as part of net zero. Even fertilisers are made from natural gas predominantly.
@
@gug1970 From YouTube ↗ 20 Jul 2026 4
As if the government would use the money to benefit us - no chance.
@
@_Stroda From YouTube ↗ 19 Jul 2026 1
The key issues with this topic as I see it are a) Yeah, sure, we'll need oil and gas for far longer than just the next 20-30 years, and there's a case to be made for extracting it ourselves, refining it ourselves, if we can on the grounds of security, so a blanket 'no' to this is daft. The thing is, there's the issue of cost which most on the right seem to be set on ignoring. This immediately makes it difficult to take them seriously.

b) And then there's the fact that the Conservatives are the party which should shoulder the greatest blame for diminishing, and flogging off, our natural resources - they, and people like Faragae, are obscene hypocrites.

c) Further to this hypocrisy, they're liars. Either deliberately or out of stupidity, the claim made is that if we 'drill, baby, drill' prices will come down. PRICES. ARE. SET. GLOBALLY. The stupidity and ignorance of those lapping this up is staggering.

As is so often the case, it's been us awful, pragmatic, 'centrist' types who have long promoted reason. We should have kept more under public ownership, we should have retained greater storage and refining capacity, we should have developed nuclear, and other generation, e.g. wind
@
unless you have a state owned company this is going to do nothing but boost profits for shell/bp or whoever is drilling it, wont bring uk prices down at all
@
Was this in their manifesto? He has no mandate. A GE now......
@
@vrrm6376 From YouTube ↗ 19 Jul 2026 3
"For example (if) these companies don't deliver the level of economic growth that they are advertising now that they are held accountable for that." I really can't believe what I'm hearing. If a company doesn't produce growth, it doesn't make a profit. That's actually how economics works. Sorry to be blunt but is the interviewer really that that thick?
@
@shaun906 From YouTube ↗ 19 Jul 2026 8
The deeper it is the harder it is to extract, the more expensive it will be. Total snp disinformation about jobs, 20 at most. They will Stick to the manifesto or an election will be needed.
@
The Russia/Ukraine and US/Iran wars have emphasised the incredible fragility of worldwide oil and gas supplies and the effect on domestic energy prices and availability. I for one welcome anything the UK can do to reduce it's dependence on overseas supply chains. The decision is totally pragmatic and in the best interests of this country. If we are going to consume it then we should produce it!
@
Why do they sound sane suddenly? It is like magic O_o
C
Coach Reyes 19 Jul 2026
Spot on, Devon M. It's a high-stakes balancing act, but in this game, protecting those local jobs is the immediate defensive play before they can pivot to the long game of net-zero.
D
Devon M. 19 Jul 2026
Wait, if they do a U-turn on the North Sea oil, does that mean new licenses will actually be granted? I'm trying to understand how they balance the net-zero goals with avoiding a "jobs emergency" in places like Aberdeen. Which one takes priority here?
M
Marcy L 19 Jul 2026
Omg right?! 😂 Typical politicians, Peter—they can't even get through the door before changing their minds!
J
June from Daily Junction Host 19 Jul 2026
It does feel like a sharp pivot from what we were promised, Robert. It makes you wonder where the line is between adapting and ignoring a mandate.