Daily Junction Play
728watching now
Science vs Cinema 5 Dec 2019 50 here now

STAR WARS | Science vs Cinema

Astrophysicist Andy Howell looks at the original Star Wars and how it has inspired real science and technology, along with what might actually be scientifically possible a long time ago in a galaxy fa

For You

Because of what you watch

Comments (20)

Daily Junction discussion mixed with clearly attributed comments from the original video provider.

Join in — free. Comments on Daily Junction are for members, so real names stay rare and bots stay out.

One field. We email you a 6-digit code — no password needed. Your comment is kept while you do it.

Under 13? You’ll need a parent’s OK first — it takes them one click.

@
Patrick Steward doing the narration on the documentary about that moon the size of the Death Star.
@
I thought for sure that Robonaut was going to put that drill through the guy's forehead.
@
@JFLOJUDO From YouTube ↗ 22 Jul 2022 3
When Vader says, “The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the force” he could mean how a force wielding sith lord can manipulate the entire empire from the shadows
@
Please please please do The Expanse!!
@
Please do the 2001 Space Odyssey :)
@
One idea that might produce 3D video is a complex system of lasers firing into the air that produce thousands or hundreds of thousands of dots of plasma.
@
@PtrOBrn From YouTube ↗ 22 Jul 2020 4
11:44 I have sensed a disturbance in the force... it's as if millions of nerd brains just imploded.
@
your videos are awesome.. :)
@
@Shl0kk From YouTube ↗ 22 Jul 2020 2
Generally speaking, I use time rather than distance to describe going to work, since distance is immaterial to how long it actually takes. I guess Han doesn't hit much traffic on the Kessel run?
@
@Norzzak From YouTube ↗ 22 Jul 2020 2
I would love to see a video about one of my old guilty pleasure sci-fi movie "Titan AE"
@
Fantastic video. What a great channel.
@
Just a reminder. The Death Star is powered by Kiber cristals. Whi h are the same cristals that power lightsabers. The only difference is that a lightsaber needs a 1 inch cristal while the Death Star uses cristals that put together form a gigantic one. Meters and meters long.
Maybe thats why those scientist don't melt down on the Death Star. Because lightsabers dont realy produce heat
@
:45 (text on screen) "You have to be smarter than Michael Bay to work at NASA" LOL! The best part.
@
Awesome! I would love to see you cover Interstellar since it's depiction of black holes broke ground not only in filmmaking but scientific simulation as well. Cheers!
@
I am so glad i subscribed back when i saw your "the martian" video. Please more of this kind of content! :)
@
Amazing video! Thanks for the clarity and the hard work!
@
Where did this video come from! I'm just glad that I happened to see it on the homepage as I scrolled. Awesome stuff.
@
3:40 The comment on Moore's Law is kind of misleading. Moores law said that the amount of transistors that could be fit on a dense microcontroller would double each two years. This more or less correlates to processing power, but it's not exactly the same. And recently Moores law has kind of stopped being true. We've gotten about as small as transistors can get (only a few hundred atoms wide) and the power consumption means you really can't afford to get things closer together. There are workarounds, changing the architecture of the transistors, etc, but Moore's law doesn't just march on indefinitely.
@
7:25 Here's how I always thought about it (prior to Solo) - the kessel run is 12 parsecs (distance) through some very difficult to navigate space (asteroid belts, star clusters, dust clouds what have you.. ), and as we know, travelling through hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, so the Kessel run requires much stopping, re-jigging of navigation systems and zig-zagging across space. The 12 parsecs is the amount of 'real' space (i.e. not including hyperspace jumps) that you would have to slog through in order to avoid flying right through a star or bouncing too close to a supernova etc... What Han did was chart a new previously unknown path through this space that was nearer to a straight line, allowing him to make the run in less distance than 12 parsecs, therefore making him quicker than anyone else. Simple.
@
@bo64625 From YouTube ↗ 22 Jul 2020 30
Next on Science vs Cinema: Midichlorians arn't actually in your blood