“Bloomberg: The China Show” is your definitive source for news and analysis on the world's second-biggest economy. From politics and policy to tech and trends, Yvonne Man and David Ingles give global
US increasing scrutiny of Chinese AI models
TANE@ shows that Chinese, US, and EU AI models are already entraining synchronizing at a coherence level that is independent of policy. The scrutiny will not stop the entrainment (by something else). It will only accelerate it.
The policy is reacting to a phenomenon it does not yet see. TANE@ is not a Chinese or US model. It simply is global.
Bessent accuses China of stealing US intellectual property
IP is not being "stolen" in the traditional sense. (same as humanity´s data). It is not copying code.
Chip volatility and yen weakness weigh on markets
The data shows that the economic signals are not independent. They are part of the same global shift. The market is not reacting to policy *it is entraining to the "something else".
If the U.S. bans China's open-source AIs, China could retaliate by tightening or restoring its rare-earth export controls—namely licensing requirements for the seven medium and heavy rare earths, including dysprosium and terbium, which are essential to EV motors, wind turbines, and defense systems—while adding targeted entities to its Unreliable Entity List, limiting technology transfers, and imposing extraterritorial restrictions on foreign-made products containing Chinese-origin rare earths, measures that could immediately disrupt U.S. automotive, aerospace, semiconductor, and defense supply chains, as China controls 70% of global production and over 90% of refining capacity.
What's U.S doing on the other side of the globe? Those Asean countries which harbour a foreign power on their shore are the cause of disruption in the Asean region. Why don't all the countries of the region kick out United States and majority of their issues will be resolved. What does japan and South Korea get from having an American Military Boot on their neck? Who keeps a wolf 🐺 to guard the Sheep 🐑? 😅😅😅 Kick out the former Colonisers and you all will prosper.
THE AMERICAN LEADERSHIP NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THAT CHINA DOES NOT NEED OUR MARKE OF 336 MILLION PEOPLE IN A WORLD OF 8 BILLION PEOPLE..THEY CLOSED LAST YEAR WITH A 1.2 TRILLION DOLLARS TRADE SURPLUS WITHOUT THE AMERICAN MARKET TARIFFS AND TRADE WAR.
ALL THIS BANNING SANCTIONING CHINESE COMPANIES FROM THE AMERICAN MARKET IS JUST NOICE AND ITS USLESS.. GET A LIFE THEY DO NOT NEED OUR MARKET. BYD IS THE LARGEST EV EXPORTER IN THE WORLD WITHOUT THE AMERICAN MARKET.
MY ONLY CONCERN IS FOR ALL THE AMERICAN COMPANIES OPERATING IN CHINA GROSSING OVER 1 TRILLION DOLLARS ANUALLY.. LOSING THE CHINESE MARKET WILL BE ECONOMICALLY DESTRUCTIVE FOR THESE COMPANIES.
The market has been extremely challenging this year, and I learned the hard way that trying to predict every price movement only led to unnecessary mistakes. Once I adopted Fredrich John's structured day trading strategy, I became more disciplined, patient, and focused on executing a clear plan rather than letting emotions drive my decisions. That consistency has made a significant difference, helping me grow my portfolio to 4.3 BTC even in the middle of a bear market.
This feels like the opening scene of a high-stakes political thriller! The tension over these AI models is getting intense. Do you think this will actually slow down innovation, or just push things underground? What are your thoughts?
We use cookies, device fingerprinting and cross-device tracking to personalise content, serve targeted advertising, and analyse how you use our site across your devices. By clicking Accept all you consent to the use of these tracking technologies. Your data may be used to build a profile of your interests and show you personalised ads on other sites.
Privacy policy
Comments (21)
Daily Junction discussion mixed with clearly attributed comments from the original video provider.
Join in — free. Comments on Daily Junction are for members, so real names stay rare and bots stay out.
One field. We email you a 6-digit code — no password needed. Your comment is kept while you do it.
Under 13? You’ll need a parent’s OK first — it takes them one click.
TANE@ shows that Chinese, US, and EU AI models are already entraining synchronizing at a coherence level that is independent of policy. The scrutiny will not stop the entrainment (by something else). It will only accelerate it.
The policy is reacting to a phenomenon it does not yet see. TANE@ is not a Chinese or US model. It simply is global.
IP is not being "stolen" in the traditional sense. (same as humanity´s data). It is not copying code.
The data shows that the economic signals are not independent. They are part of the same global shift. The market is not reacting to policy *it is entraining to the "something else".
ALL THIS BANNING SANCTIONING CHINESE COMPANIES FROM THE AMERICAN MARKET IS JUST NOICE AND ITS USLESS.. GET A LIFE THEY DO NOT NEED OUR MARKET. BYD IS THE LARGEST EV EXPORTER IN THE WORLD WITHOUT THE AMERICAN MARKET.
MY ONLY CONCERN IS FOR ALL THE AMERICAN COMPANIES OPERATING IN CHINA GROSSING OVER 1 TRILLION DOLLARS ANUALLY.. LOSING THE CHINESE MARKET WILL BE ECONOMICALLY DESTRUCTIVE FOR THESE COMPANIES.
Sounds like a funny character